Home / Compare / vs Cursor
comparison · Sentrely vs. Cursor

Sentrely vs. Cursor: AI IDE vs. Agent Control Plane

Cursor is an AI-first IDE for individual developers. Sentrely governs the Cursor agents your team is already running.

comparison Cursor IDE AI editor agent governance
Last updated

Sentrely vs Cursor — feature by feature

The short version. Scroll past the table for the full breakdown.

Feature
us
Sentrely
them
Cursor
AI-powered code editor (chat, tab-complete, agent mode)
Routes Cursor agents through a control plane
Policy-based RBAC for what agents can touch
Full audit trail of every tool call & API request
Human-in-the-loop approvals (Slack/Telegram)
Multi-provider model routing (Claude, GPT, etc.)
Bring-your-own-subscription via OAuth
Cost / token budgets per project
Limited
Multi-agent orchestration & A2A messaging
Meant to replace your IDE

Cursor and Sentrely solve completely different problems. Cursor is an AI-first IDE — a fork of VS Code that gives developers Tab-completion, in-line chat, and agent mode for refactoring code. Sentrely is the control plane that sits behind tools like Cursor, governing what its agents are allowed to do once they leave the editor.

If you’re a solo developer writing code, you want Cursor. If you’re a team running Cursor (or any other AI agent) against production infrastructure, you want both.

What Cursor Is

Cursor is the editor your developers actually open. It provides:

  • Tab completion that’s aware of your whole repo
  • Inline chat (“⌘K”) to edit blocks of code
  • Agent mode — autonomous multi-file refactors and bug fixes
  • Composer — repo-aware code generation
  • MCP support — connect Cursor to external tools

Cursor lives on a developer’s laptop. It writes code. It can run shell commands. It can hit your APIs. It’s incredible for individual productivity.

What Sentrely Is

Sentrely is the gateway between your AI agents (including Cursor’s agent mode) and the outside world. It provides:

  • Policy-based RBAC — which AWS actions, git repos, and tools each agent can touch
  • Audit trail — every tool call, approval, and API request, logged automatically
  • Human-in-the-loop approvals — risky operations gate on your approval, delivered via Slack or Telegram
  • Multi-provider failover — define a backup model so an outage at Claude doesn’t stop your agents
  • Cost controls — per-project token budgets, rate limits, spend alerts

Sentrely doesn’t write code. It makes sure the agents that do write code don’t push to main without approval, leak secrets, or burn $4.20 in tokens looping on a 429.

When You Need Both

This is the most common case for engineering teams that have adopted Cursor:

  1. Developers use Cursor day-to-day for editing code.
  2. Cursor’s agent mode connects to Sentrely as the gateway URL.
  3. Every shell command, AWS call, and tool invocation Cursor agents make routes through Sentrely’s policy engine.
  4. Risky operations (push to main, delete production data, rotate secrets) gate on approval in Slack.
  5. Every agent run is recorded in an immutable audit log streamed to your S3.

The result: your developers keep the productivity of Cursor agent mode, your security team gets the controls they need, and your audit team gets compliance evidence by default.

Honest Trade-offs

Pick Cursor alone if you’re a solo dev or small startup with no production infrastructure to protect. The IDE experience is excellent on its own.

Pick Sentrely alone if your agents aren’t running through Cursor — you have custom Claude Code or OpenAI Codex agents in your CI/CD pipeline, on a server, or in a Lambda.

Pick both if you’re a team of 5+ developers using Cursor agent mode against shared infrastructure. Cursor accelerates writing; Sentrely keeps the writing safe.

Pricing

  • Cursor Pro: $20/month per user. Cursor Business: $40/user/month.
  • Sentrely: $199/month for a team (10 agents, 2 seats). $999/month for business (20 agents, 10 seats, SSO/SCIM).

These aren’t competing line items — Cursor is per-developer, Sentrely is per-team. Most teams running both end up with Cursor Pro on every developer plus one Sentrely Team or Business plan.

The Bottom Line

Cursor makes your developers faster. Sentrely makes the agents your developers spawn safe to run in production. Use them together — Cursor in front of the keyboard, Sentrely behind every API call.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about Sentrely vs Cursor.

Is Sentrely a Cursor alternative?

No — Sentrely doesn't replace Cursor. Cursor is the IDE your developers open every day. Sentrely is the control plane sitting behind Cursor, governing what Cursor's agent mode can do once it leaves the editor (push to git, run shell commands, hit AWS, etc.). They're complementary.

Why do teams use Sentrely with Cursor?

Cursor agent mode is powerful but unaudited — it'll happily run any shell command or git push it thinks is right. For teams shipping to production, that's risky. Sentrely lets you define policies (e.g. 'never push to main without approval'), keeps an immutable audit log of every agent action, and gates risky operations on human approval delivered to Slack.

Does Sentrely work with Cursor's existing OAuth?

Yes. Cursor agents authenticate to Sentrely via OAuth. Each developer signs in with their existing Cursor Pro account — no extra API keys needed. Sentrely then enforces team-level policies on every request from any logged-in Cursor user.

How is Sentrely different from Cursor's Business plan?

Cursor Business adds team-level admin features inside the editor (SSO, usage analytics, privacy controls). Sentrely controls what agents do outside the editor — actual policy enforcement on AWS calls, git operations, and external APIs. Most teams use both: Cursor Business for editor management, Sentrely for runtime governance.

Can I see what every Cursor developer's agents are doing?

Yes. Sentrely's dashboard shows live agent sessions, every tool call, and full conversation history per agent. You can filter by user, project, or action type, and replay any session. The audit log streams to your own S3 bucket for compliance.

Do I need Sentrely if I'm a solo Cursor user?

Probably not. Sentrely's value comes from team-level governance — policies, approvals, audit trails. If you're solo and just want a great AI editor, Cursor alone is the right answer. Once you're on a team of 3+ developers running Cursor agent mode against shared infrastructure, Sentrely becomes worth it.

What does Sentrely cost on top of Cursor?

Sentrely is per-team, not per-developer: $199/mo for the Team plan (10 agents, 2 admin seats), $999/mo Business (20 agents, 10 seats, SSO/SCIM). Cursor Pro is $20/user/month. So a 10-developer team running both pays roughly $200 (Cursor) + $199 (Sentrely Team) = $399/mo.

Ready to control your AI agents?

Join the beta. Get a managed control plane for your Claude, Cursor, and Codex agents — no infra to set up.

AI agent stories, every 2 weeks

Real-world lessons on running AI agents in production — RBAC patterns, audit gotchas, approval workflows. No spam.

Unsubscribe anytime · No spam, ever

// talk-to-us

Tell us what you're building

We reply within one business day.

Platforms / tools you're using or evaluating *

Or email us directly at jordan@sentrely.com

get early access

Get early access

Leave your details and we'll reach out to get you set up.

No spam. We'll only use this to set up your access.